Radware and Zevenet Comparison

Strengths

• Offers a deep and broad set of security capabilities and performance features integrated with its ADC features.
• Provides very flexible deployment and delivery options including capex and operating expenditure.
• Provides out-of-the-box integration with leading orchestration solutions.
• Supports high virtualization density on all of its appliances.
• Provides investment protection through a five-year longevity guarantee on its ADC platforms.

• Disruptive vision with a stable growth as challengers in the ADC market, with an agile team and engaged community.
• Innovation driven with Open Source technology with no vendor lock-in and broad platforms integration (hardware, virtual, bare metal and cloud).
• Very high cost-effective solutions without limitation products and services, suitable for both midsize organizations and large enterprises.
• Investment in R&D to deliver a technology driven by easiness, performance and security.

Weaknesses

• Customers cite the GUI as an area for improvement, based on inquiry and research surveys.
• Underperforms in marketing and brand recognition.
• Does not currently support SSL VPN functionality or provide a containerized ADC instance form factor.
• Operates globally however its coverage and routes to the market are not as comprehensive as some of its competitors.

• Young brand as an open source startup company and yet to develop a big influence than other more established vendors.
• Still a small company however committed to growth.
• Most required features are available but yet requires some functional properties.
• Needs to develop a broader partnership network.