Kemp and ZEVENET Comparison

Kemp Technologies and ZEVENET Comparison*

Comparison between Kemp and Zevenet, Kemp alternatives, similar to Kemp

Zevenet vs F5, comparison between F5 and Zevenet, F5 alternative, load balancer, ADC, application delivery controller

Strengths

Kemp offers flexible deployment and strong feature set, pricing and consumption models which reduce costs.
Is gaining increased visibility in the market and offers a price/feature mix that is well aligned.
Offers a free virtual LoadMaster version supported by community that clients can download and use.
Was the first commercial ADC vendor to deeply integrate its products within Microsoft Azure.

Disruptive vision with a stable growth as challengers in the ADC market, with an agile team and engaged community.
Innovation driven with Open Source technology with no vendor lock-in and broad platforms integration (hardware, virtual, bare metal and cloud).
Very high cost-effective solutions without limitation products and services, suitable for both midsize organizations and large enterprises.
Investment in R&D to deliver a technology driven by easiness, performance and security.
Is a complete ADC (Application Delivery Controller) that could manage all kinds of network protocols (UDP, TCP, HTTP/S, SCTP, SIP, T/FTP, …) but also with a combination of all of them simultaneously and multiport capabilities; and it’s not oriented to licensed features.
Its operating system is fully optimized for networking so it is capable to move in layer 7 more than 140 thousand concurrent users and in layer 4 more than 10 million concurrent users with only 2 dedicated cores.
Ability to create configuration backups, easy cluster configuration, automatic replication from one node to another and stateful cluster with real time sessions replications that permits a failover between nodes without losing any connection.
Provides an integrated IPDS security system with real time black hole lists, DoS protection, black/white listing and protection of the most common network attacks.
Provides a very UX graphic interface for both operators and network engineers in Angular 2 technology.
Automation capabilities thanks to it’s fully programmable REST+JSON API.

Weaknesses

Kemp has limited traction and experience in larger enterprises compared to leading ADC competitors.
Kemp has limited size, enterprise market penetration and channel coverage compared to leading competitors.
Lacks certain features, such as SAML service provider (SP) and feature depth with its Web Application Firewall, compared with other ADC vendors·

Young brand as an open source company and yet to develop a big influence than other more established vendors.
Needs to develop a broader partnership network.

*The Kemp Technologies and ZEVENET comparison above has been summarised from the latest Gartner ADC report of 2016.

ZEVENET ADC Benefits

Proud to be open,
Open for being easier.

adc limits

Limitless

We do not believe in limitations per core, memory or throughput. Our ADC solution performs with the maximum resources available.

adc high-tech

HighTech

We research and develop open high technology to gather the best performance, scalability and high availability.

adc user experience

UX

We design user experience and automated interfaces to make application reliability technology easy.

adc support team

Team

Our agile Team always available to make your life easier and your challenges made true.

Would you like more info?

CONTACT US